87RxU9qO1J

(Reporter Sun Ying) Chinese People's Public Security University student Liu freshman first semester three exam, directly ordered to leave the school,http://www.wjy2009.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=23039, Liu believes the school's punishment is not justified,air jordan pas cher, the Beijing Municipal Education Commission complaint. Claiming to interrupt their studies because six months have not received a reply,http://www.soccertalks.info/fluxbb/viewtopic.php?pid=60379#p60379, he sued the city Board of Education is not assumed responsibility. This morning,http://web.thu.edu.tw/kudo/www/bbs/yybbs/yyregi.cgi, the case in the West Court. & Nbsp;
 
Make-up did not even have a chance to
 
This morning,http://www.urbandead.com/signup.cgi, the 18-year-old Liu did not personally go to court, but a lawyer in court. Lawyer told reporters last September after Liu was organized school enrollment to participate in military training, to assist the National Security and other large non-learning transaction, consumes more than a month of learning time. After the commencement, after only two months, Liu will have to face seven courses the first semester final exam. Moreover, the school will be an open-book examination of the original course into a closed-book exam, more than 1,300 freshmen "hanging branches." Liu is three exam.
 
March 18 this year, Liu suddenly received a "withdrawal decision,chaussures louboutin pas cher," the school sent to his course failed three exams on the grounds, so quitting school. Make-up did not even have a chance to. The lawyer said, Liu is from a small town in Shaanxi test out the student step by step, very anxious after being out of school.
 
Lawyers said that in the previous Student Management provisions indeed do have three exam prescribed withdrawal process. But after the national education reform, in 2005 and released a new student enrollment regulations, this one has been canceled. But Liu's schools still follow the old rules, does not comply with the direction of reform, and even the opportunity to make-up do not give, there is no protection of the right to education of students.
 
Liu said in the indictment, the school decided to neither legal nor reasonable, but not reasonable. He hoped that the school closure decision, received no answer, and then appeal to the Board of Education. "May interrupt their studies for six months,http://223.4.211.155:8088/jianzhu_talk/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=292783, the Board of Education has not given a written reply,http://www.cap.ne.jp, although notify the school withdraw the decision, but I did not receive school news." Liu believes that the Board of Education did not fulfill the statutory duties,nike mercurial,http://www.yfdzw.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=660414, and therefore sued the city Board of Education perform their statutory duties immediately its complaint submitted written replies.
 
Board of Education said the only proposal right
 
City Board of Education can be described as the respondent in the court shouted wronged. Expressed in accordance with the Board of Education, students dissatisfied with the penalty decision of the school,louboutin pas cher, the school should submit an application review, to review the responses dissatisfied can appeal to the Board of Education. But Liu's school did not make the review decision, Liu appeal directly to the City Board of Education, is not eligible. However, the Board of Education is also actively investigate and coordinate,louboutin roma, find University of Liu's appeal inadmissible is not consistent with the Education Act and Regulations. Board of Education actively supervise school for review, revoke the original decision to drop out, to re-examine the process of Liu.
 
Agents said the Board of Education issued a special system "on efforts to work according to law students to deal with the Letter" to the school. In the recommendation letter, the Board of Education proposed school misquoted school regulations, and did not inform the student complaints procedure,http://www.british1.co.uk/cgi-bin/search.cgi, not strictly fulfill the service of process. Their urge to make the school revoked the original decision to drop out and make a new handle. Although the new school made the decision to drop out is still processing, but has corrected previous errors.
 
Liu's lawyer countered that time the Board of Education's proposal to send a letter of July 13, from Liu appeal application has been three months, extended administration. Moreover, the Board of Education if the school really find punishment is wrong, it should be strictly perform their statutory duties.
 
Board of Education said that the students' academic requirement is the scope of school autonomy requirements, the Board of Education can only recommend schools consider, as appropriate ways and means to deal with.
 
Students said he was surprised observers
 
This morning, many teachers and students to attend universities and vocational colleges case hearing. After the Beijing Normal University, several students heard the reasons for withdrawal Liu was very surprised: "In our school have not heard directly three exam requires students to drop out."
 
The students said that according to their understanding, if such a thing happened in Beijing Normal University, the school may require students to postpone graduation, all the make-up exam did not pass by after a diploma. If special reasons students may repeat diseases. But not so unreasoning, do not give make-up would require withdrawal. Several students said in unison after the exchange said that "withdrawal is unreasonable." & Nbsp; & nbsp;
 
The case is no court verdict.