yed5AM5Aw0
Yunnan Network (Reporter Zhao Gang) Kunming construction workers money Shiyuan bit miserable fate, accidentally fell from the elevator shaft straight down,http://www.dojjj.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, almost into a vegetative state. And several construction-related companies are unwilling to take responsibility, desperation Qian Shi far only put them all to court and claims 186 million yuan. October 12, Kunming, Yunnan University of Finance Wuhua open court hearing the case, although the parties are willing to mediate, but the differences were too great, there is no consensus in court.
The trial court is Wuhua "sun of justice" into one of the people in a series of activities, the NPC deputies and CPPCC members Wuhua part of Yunnan University of Finance and hundreds of students participate in the trial and fill out the "trial into the people," the questionnaire.
According to the plaintiff's agent money Shiyuan statement in May 2011 money Shiyuan employed defendant Yang Tai Building Management Co., Ltd., Kunming, in the Southern District Tianjiao Mountain site in construction work. July 12 the same year, the money away from the defendant Shanghai World Fuji Elevator Co., Tianjiao Mountain Kunming Shanghai Mitsubishi Elevator Service Co., Ltd. is a construction and installation of two units a floor indoor elevator shaft fall injuries. After the man sent to hospital for treatment,http://bbs.cnw.com.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=,nike air max 90 outlet, and the level of disability was identified up, all require lifelong care.
As the elevator after the construction side unwilling to bear responsibility, money Shiyuan frustration of four related companies - Shanghai Fuji Elevator Co.,hogan sito ufficiale, Ltd., Kunming, Shanghai Mitsubishi Elevator Service Co., Ltd., Kunming Tai Yang construction management company, Sichuan Yatai Construction Co. are court to require the defendant to compensate the loss of four 1,866,779.22 yuan.
Money Shiyuan agents believe,louboutin femme, according to the relevant provisions of the "Civil Law" and "Tort Liability Act," the defendant Shanghai Fuji Elevator Co., Ltd., Kunming, Shanghai Mitsubishi Elevator Service Co., an elevator construction unit, in the construction process of the security risk does not Set clear signs and take security measures to deal with the loss of money Shiyuan civil liability.
The defendant Kunming Shanghai Fuji Elevator Co.,http://webshop.tafcue.com, Ltd., Kunming, Shanghai Mitsubishi Elevator Service Co., said in reply, Kunming Tai Yang Building Management Co., Ltd. and Kunming, Shanghai Mitsubishi Elevator Service Co., Ltd. signed a "professional elevator installation management responsibility agreement" in charge of the elevator doorway fence installation and maintenance, which in turn lifts the doorway fence later subcontracted to Sichuan Yatai Construction Co. Ltd. to implement. Therefore, the responsibility for the accident should not be far from the world of money from Kunming Shanghai Fuji Elevator Co., Ltd.,http://onigdesign.com/error.html, Kunming, Shanghai Mitsubishi Elevator Service Co., Ltd. commitment.
Moreover, the day,http://maplesikou.seesaa.net, the money was not wearing a helmet Shiyuan, entered the incident occurred,bracciali tiffany, not pay attention to their own safety, fall into the well itself with gross negligence.
Kunming Tai Yang construction management company, Sichuan Yatai Construction Co., said the civil works was responsible for the elevator installation March 20,http://events.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/display.cgi, 2011 transferred to Kunming,http://tc2s.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=747344, Shanghai Mitsubishi Elevator Service Co., Ltd.,scarpe hogan,http://www.autoxcar.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=12885, on the transfer list and signed by both parties who are responsible for with responsibility for the accident or not.
Shanghai Fuji Elevator Co., Ltd., Kunming, Shanghai Mitsubishi Elevator Service Co., argued that although the sub-handed person responsible for signing, but not sealed, are "invalid surrender." The real transfer in July 19, 2011, the transfer again after the accident.
The two sides heated debate in the courts, the judges comments last few party, the original defendants were willing to mediate. However, due to several parties are too far apart, there is no consensus in court.
